12/31/2023 0 Comments Update adobe acrobat reader![]() For more information,please refer to the Adobe's website.ĭownload Adobe Acrobat Reader DC (Japanese) If an update from the menu is not available, please download the latest Adobe Acrobat and Reader from the following URLs. Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017 Classic 2017 (17.012.30249) (Windows, macOS)Īcrobat will be updated by starting the product, selecting the menu"Help", and then clicking "Check for Updates". Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Continuous (22.001.20169) (Windows, macOS) Adobe Acrobat DC Continuous (22.001.20169) (Windows, macOS) SolutionPlease update Adobe products to the latest versions listed below. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Continuous (22.001.20142) and earlier (Windows, macOS) Adobe Acrobat DC Continuous (22.001.20142) and earlier (Windows, macOS) ![]() Affected ProductsAffected products and versions are as follows: Security update available for Adobe Acrobat and Reader | APSB22-32 As a result, an attacker may execute arbitrary code by convincing a user to open contents leveraging the vulnerabilities.For more information, please refer to the Adobe's website. ![]() OverviewVulnerabilities exist in Adobe Acrobat, a PDF file creation and conversion software, and Adobe Acrobat Reader, a PDF file viewing software. Task using Windows Task Scheduler: "%CommonProgramFiles%\Adobe\Updater6\Adobe_Updater.I. There are two sections which could be interesting for you. This article was very useful to me in deploying Adobe Acrobat Reader: As such, I'm dubious of the effectiveness and reliablity of "patch management" tools over using software assignment, "Redeploy.", and hand-written scripts to deploy patches. Tools that "silently install" patches often require the same amount of work that I'd put into writing a script to install the patch anyway. Tools that do "snapshotting" aren't actually capturing the logic in an installer, and could do the wrong thing under circumstances different than when the snapshot was taken. Patch management tools that claim to automate the patching process have always given me a bit of pause. I've never used a third-party patch management tool, so I can't comment. I disable the updater as a transform to the MSI for Adobe Reader. Users don't have "Administrator" rights on their computers and can't install any updates themselves anyway. I need to be able to centrally control the deployment of updates such that I can test the update prior to deployment. Having the client computers download patches themselves via the built-in updater functionality in Adobe Reader is useless to me. (If you've got the money to pony-up for Microsoft's System Center Configuration Manager, you can use the built-in System Center Update Publisher to deploy these types of updates.) If they do go to EXE-based updates, I'll write scripts to deploy them silently via computer startup scripts. (Hopefully they'll stick to a Windows Installer based patching regime from here on out. If Adobe decides to start distributing EXE-based patches, then I've got a problem and have to begin writing scripts. This recent Adobe Reader patch (9.1.2) is MSP-based, so I'm able to deploy it in my usual manner. I don't particularly like doing things this way, but it's the least labor-intensive method I can see. I've been applying MSP-based patches to my Adobe Reader installation points and then instructing client computers to reinstall via the "Redeploy." functionality in Group Policy. I install Adobe Reader via Group Policy and software assignment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |